The science and technology race and productive re-structuring: geoeconomic and geopolitical impacts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.2019v21n2p241Keywords:
Chinese growth, Asian expansion, global crisis, technology race, Brazilian de-industrialization, industrial policy, science and technology policy, regional developmentAbstract
The accelerated growth of the Chinese economy and of other Asian countries has broad
ened the participation of the Asian bloc in international production and trade. This process has changed
economic geography and global order, thereby creating a strong challenge to Western capitalism, which is under
going a structural crisis, seeking to recover its relative position. The consequence of the competition between the
two blocs has been a rapid science and technology race. On the other hand, Brazil has experienced a speedy
process of deindustrialization and a reduction of investment in R&D, which may also hinder the ongoing
productive deconcentration. The difficult industrial recovery and the preservation of the regional deconcen
tration process requires the structuring of a new, affirmative industrial policy with a long-term view, and an
emphasis on science and technology. It should also guarantee the consolidation of ongoing projects and affor
special attention to taking advantage of regional potentials with a view to broadening the trends of territorial
decentralization.
Downloads
References
AMSDEN, A. H. Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
ARORA, A.; ATHREYE, S. The Software industry and India’s economic development.
Information economics and policy. Vol. 14, issue 2, pg. 253-273, june 2002.
ARRIGHI, G. [2007] Adam Smith em Pequim: origens e fundamentos do século XXI. Rio de Janeiro: Boitempo Editorial, 2011.
AZZONI, C. R. Indústria e reversão da polarização no Brasil.São Paulo: IPE-USP, 1986.
BARBOSA, R.M et al. A indústria, o PSI, o BNDES e algumas propostas. Rio de Janeiro:
BNDES, 2017. (Texto para discussão 114)
BASU, K. An economist in the real world: the art of policymaking in India. MIT Press, 2015.
BECK, U. The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.
BRESSER-PEREIRA, L.C.; MARCONI, N. Existe doença holandesa no Brasil? In:
BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C. (Org.). Doença Holandesa e Indústria. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2010. pp. 207-230.
CANUTO, O.; DE NEGRI, F. Does Brazil´s Sector Structure Explain its Productivity Anemia? Huffington Post. 20 June, 2017. (Disponível em: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/does- brazils-sector-structure-explain-its-productivity_us_594854ebe4b0f7875b83e535 acessado em 31/07/2017).
CASTRO, A. B. de; SOUZA, F. E. P. de. A Economia Brasileira em Marcha Forçada. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1985.
CLINGINGSMITH, D. Industrialization, Bilingualism, and Linguistic Heterogeneity in Mid-20th Century India. Case Western Reserve University, unpublished paper, 2008.
COUTINHO, L.; KUPFER, D. As múltiplas oportunidades de desenvolvimento e o futuro da indústria brasileira. In: DE TONI, J. (Org.) Dez anos de Política Industrial: Balanço e perspectivas. Brasília: ABDI, 2015.
DE NEGRI, F. Inovação e produtividade: por uma renovada agenda de políticas públicas.
Brasília: IPEA, 2016.
DINIZ, C.C. Os riscos e as incertezas do gnosticismo científico e tecnológico contemporâneo, in D´INCAO, M. A. (organizadora) Domínio das Tecnologias, São Paulo, Letras a margem, 2015.
D´INCAO, M.A. (organizadora). Domínio das Tecnologias, São Paulo, Metras a margem, 2015
DINIZ, C. C.; CROCCO, M. A. Reestruturação econômica e impacto regional: o novo mapa da indústria brasileira. Nova Economia, v. 6, n. 1, p. 77-103, 1996.
DUNFORD, Ml. Chinese economic development and its social and institutional foundations. In: DUNFORD, M.; LIU, W. (Orgs.) The Geographical Transformation of China. New York: Routledge, 2015.
ESPECIAL INOVAÇÃO, São Paulo, Valor Econômico, novembro 2016.
FREEMAN, C; LOUÇÃ, F. As time goes by: from the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
FULIN, C. The Road to China's Prosperity: in the Next Three Decades. China Intercontinental Press, 2010.
IEDI, Carta 797, São Paulo, 2017.
KNIIVILÄ, M. Industrial development and economic growth: Implications for poverty reduction and income inequality. In: UNITED NATIONS. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC; UNITED NATIONS. COMMISSION ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Industrial Development for the 21st Century: Sustainable Development Perspectives. United Nations Publications, p. 295- 333, 2007.
KUPFER, D. Modernização em ondas. Valor Econômico, 22 Junho 2017. (Disponível em: http://www.valor.com.br/opiniao/5013182/modernizacao-em-ondas acessado em 21/08/2017)
LAPLANE, M. A INDÚSTRIA AINDA É O MOTOR DO CRESCIMENTO? Teoria e evidências, in ABDI, dez anos de política industrial: balanço e pespectivas, Brasília, ABDI, 2015
LIU, W. Governance, politics and culture. In: DUNFORD, M.; LIU, W. (Orgs.) The Geographical Transformation of China. New York: Routledge, 2015.
LIU, W.; DUNFORD, M. Inclusive globalization: unpacking China’s belt and road iniciative.
Area Development and Policy, v.1.n 1-3, November 2016, p.324-340.
MACKINSEY DIGITAL. Industry 4.0, how to navigate digitization of the manufacturing sector.
MARKUSEN, A.; HALL, P.; CAMPBELL, S.; DEITRICK, S. The Rise of the Gunbelt: The Military Remapping of Industrial America. Oxford University Press, 1991
MARTINS, H. Experimentum Humanum: civilização tecnológica e condição humana, Belo Horizonte, Boitempo, 2013
MIRRA, E. e SALEMO, M. ABDI: a que veio, a que ficou, in ABDI, dez anos de política industrial: balanço e perspectivas, 2004-2014, Brasília, ABDI, 2015.
MORCEIRO, P. C. Vazamento de demanda setorial e competitividade da indústria de transformação brasileira. Working Papers, Department of Economics 2016_12, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), 2016.
NSTC (National Science and Technology Council), National Network for Manufacturing Innovation: A preliminary Design, January, 2013.
NNMI (National Network for Manufacturing Innovation Program), Annual Report, February, 2016.
OECD. The next production revolution: implications for governments and business. Paris: OECD, 2017.
QIAOJUAN, X; AIXIU, Z. China´s science, technology and education, Beijng, China Intercontinental Press, 2010.
RHODES, C. Manufacturing: international comparisons. House of Commons Library, jan 2018. (Briefing Paper N. 05809)
SARTI, F.; HIRATUKA, C. Desempenho recente da indústria brasileira no contexto de mudanças estruturais domésticas e globais. Campinas: UNICAMP, 2017. (Texto para discussão 290)
STREECK, W. How will capitalism end?: essays on a falling system. New York: Verso, 2016.
SCHLOSSSTEIN, S. Asia's new little dragons: the dynamic emergence of Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia. Chicago: Contemporary Books, 1991.
UNCTAD. Trade and Development Report, 2016: Structural transformation for inclusive and sustained growth. Sales No. E. 16.II.D.5. New York and Geneva: United Nations Publication. 2016.
UNIDO. Industrial development report 2016: The role of technology and innovation in inclusive and sustainable industrial development. Viena: UNIDO, 2015
WALLERSTEIN, I. et al. Does capitalism have a future? Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors who publish in RBEUR retain the rights to their work and assign to the journal the right to first publication, performed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows work to be shared and assures the recognition of authorship and of the original publication vehicle, to RBEUR.
2) Authors are free to assume additional contracts separately, for publication and non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), reaffirming the authorship and recognition of the original publication vehicle, to RBEUR.
.png)
